S-24-0964 Nancy E. White (Appellee) v. Keith N. White (Appellant)
Appeal from the District Court for Antelope County, Judge James G. Kube
Attorneys: David A. Domina (DominaLaw Group pc llo for Appellant) and Michael J. Tasset (Johnson & Mock, PC, LLO for Appellee)
Civil: Dissolution of marriage
Proceedings below: Appellee filed a complaint for legal separation, and Appellant counterclaimed for dissolution of marriage. After trial, the district court dissolved the marriage, and it valued and divided marital assets and liabilities. On its own motion, the Nebraska Supreme Court ordered this case to be transferred from the docket of the Nebraska Court of Appeals to its docket.
Issues: Appellant assigns the following errors: 1) The trial court erred when it ordered sold farms upon which the parties agreed on value, Appellee did not want the farms nor object to awarding them to Appellant at the agreed values; 2) The trial court erred when it failed to recognize that Appellant traced funds brought into the marriage to specific assets owned at the time of separation from Appellee; 3) The trial court erred when it failed to recognize that Appellant traced funds inherited during the marriage to specific assets owned at the time of separation from Appellee; 4) The trial court erred when it found that Appellant owned one half of the premarital White Grain Co stock to Appellee but failed to recognize that its assets were largely sold and funds distributed out of the company to Appellant, and traced elsewhere when the gift was made; 5) The trial court erred having found the gift of one half of White Grain Co stock proceeded to divide the remaining one half retained by Appellant by treating it as marital, thereby giving three-fourths to Appellee; 6) The trial court erred when it failed to divide debt between parties and concurrently failing to recognize that Appellee took funds from one loan and did not account for them; 7) The trial court erred when it failed to treat debt Appellant incurred to pay ordered spousal support as marital debt; and 8) The trial court erred when it failed to order Appellee to pay costs and fees Appellant incurred due to the petition in intervention though Appellee caused its filing and trial by failure