A-25-0216 Christine Reilly et al (Appellants) v. Pansing Hogan Ernst & Bachman (Appellee)
Douglas County, District Court, Judge Molly B. Keane
Attorneys for Appellants: Robert S. Sherrets, Diana J. Vogt, Guillermo M. Martinez (Sherrets Bruno & Vogt LLC)
Attorneys for Appellee: William Tannehill, Kathryn Van Balen (Baylor Evnen Wolfe & Tannehill, LLP)
Civil Action: Trusts and Estates, Malpractice
Action Taken by Trial Court: The district court granted Appellee’s motion for summary judgment.
Assignments of Error on Appeal: Appellants assigns that the district court erred in: (1) granting Appellee’s motion for summary judgment, (2) finding that defendant attorneys did not owe Christine a duty under the Perez factors, (3) finding that Christine did not have standing to sue the defendant attorneys, (4) finding that Christine did not have standing to bring claims on behalf of the trust, (5) finding that Appellee did not represent the Kubat family, (6) failing to recognize that Thomas had a conflict in purporting to represent only George, and (7) receiving exhibit 22 in its entirety over Appellants’ objections.